The Association of Model Submariners.

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

* THE FORUM FOR ALL THOSE INTERESTED IN BUILDING AND OPERATING MODEL SUBMARINES *



Join the AMS - Registered Forum users can become members of the AMS and it's free ...... To join send an email with your name , address and phone number to amstreasure@googlemail.com


For further details of any events shown here also see the "Shows and Events" section on the forum

*STOP PRESS* Coronavirus. A lot of Clubs have already cancelled all activities. Check carefully before you plan any travel

.

CANCELLED because of coronavirus. Papplewick Pumping Station, Nottingham, Sunday 12th & Monday 13th April
CANCELLED because of coronavirus. Bournville Sub Day, Sunday 10th May 2020

. ,

(CANCELLED) Submarine, Boating & Sailing Weekend, Norwich MBC, Weekend of 25,26th July

,./
.
Model Boat Convention, Haydock Park (Cancelled this year)

.

CANCELLED. Bournville Sub Day, Sunday 13th September

,,,,

(CANCELLED) Club Submarine Regatta, Furness MBC, Barrow in Furness, Sunday 20th Sept 2020

Who is online?

In total there is 0 user online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests :: 1 Bot

None


Most users ever online was 180 on Tue Nov 05, 2019 6:03 am

Latest topics

» openLRS and 2.4 Ghz and Submarines
D9 Engel Submarine EmptyTue Sep 22, 2020 9:52 am by david f

» Italian CB class from WW2
D9 Engel Submarine EmptySat Sep 12, 2020 10:30 am by david f

» Last event cancelled for 2020
D9 Engel Submarine EmptySat Sep 05, 2020 10:31 am by david f

» Simple telemetry system for openLRS (on 458Mhz)
D9 Engel Submarine EmptySat Aug 29, 2020 1:53 pm by david f

» John Lambert Plans
D9 Engel Submarine EmptyThu Aug 13, 2020 11:51 am by david f

» Piston Tank - Depth Control (Paper by Wolfgang Baumann & Helmut Huhn)
D9 Engel Submarine EmptyThu Aug 06, 2020 9:17 am by david f

» Krick Type Vll B Wiring and build photos
D9 Engel Submarine EmptyTue Jul 28, 2020 8:02 am by Deep Diver (Fred)

» New Gyro On The Market
D9 Engel Submarine EmptySat Jul 11, 2020 9:34 pm by timgarrod

» PIC and Arduino microprocessors
D9 Engel Submarine EmptyThu Jul 09, 2020 10:59 pm by timgarrod

Statistics

Our users have posted a total of 11163 messages in 1829 subjects

We have 865 registered users

The newest registered user is vmax1701a

    D9 Engel Submarine

    avatar
    DAVE J
    AMS member

    Posts : 27
    Join date : 2010-11-13
    Age : 82
    Location : Barrow-in-Furness

    D9 Engel Submarine Empty D9 Engel Submarine

    Post  DAVE J on Sun Feb 15, 2015 7:01 pm

    Sailing today the model went out of range after 30feet from the bank (on the surface) on dry land 100% ok. Last year the same problem arose and i thought it was because the aerial was in the pressure hull. Since then I have brought the aerial through the pressure hull deck and laid it under the the free flood deck.Has anyone had problems similiar?
    salmon
    salmon
    AMS Forum Owner

    Posts : 297
    Join date : 2011-09-02
    Age : 60
    Location : Las Vegas, Nevada - USA

    D9 Engel Submarine Empty Re: D9 Engel Submarine

    Post  salmon on Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:07 am

    I had the same problem. I had the aerial going outside the wtc.
    What fixed it was a different receiver (and that one I left the aerial inside the wtc).


    _________________
    If you can cut, drill, saw, hit things and swear a lot, you're well on the way to building a working model sub.
    avatar
    DAVE J
    AMS member

    Posts : 27
    Join date : 2010-11-13
    Age : 82
    Location : Barrow-in-Furness

    D9 Engel Submarine Empty D9 Engel Submarine

    Post  DAVE J on Mon Feb 16, 2015 6:57 pm

    Thank's for the reply,
    At present the TX is a Futaba FF7 and the Rx is a Futaba R147F, the BEC comes from one of the two ESC in the system, I will change the Rx to another make and see if makes a differance. Does your D9 use Bec or is the Rx supply from another source?
    I was wondering if I was getting interference from my Bec system. With the range being good out of the water and motors running without any load no interference was obvious. The only difference when in the water was the power being used to drive the motors, and then the limited range cuts the power. Within 6foot of the Tx all the controls work correctly in the water. Out of the water I have full range. I will now change the Tx
    david f
    david f
    AMS Treasurer

    Posts : 2115
    Join date : 2010-11-10
    Age : 70
    Location : Cumbria

    D9 Engel Submarine Empty Re: D9 Engel Submarine

    Post  david f on Wed Feb 18, 2015 10:09 am

    I have often had similar problems - although I have never had the aerial outside the wtc (never seems like a good idea.)

    I have gone for dual conversion receivers (Futaba mostly.) Really cheap receivers give problems!

    I have had the BEC  intermittently cutting out on Mtronik ESCs and so I sometimes use standalone becs based on the LM2940 chip. This link gives more info:

    https://www.theassociationofmodelsubmariners.com/t594-mtronik-speed-controllers-with-separate-bec

    David
    avatar
    DAVE J
    AMS member

    Posts : 27
    Join date : 2010-11-13
    Age : 82
    Location : Barrow-in-Furness

    D9 Engel Submarine Empty D9 Engel Submarine

    Post  DAVE J on Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:13 pm

    First thoughts about the aerial fed along inside the wtc alongside the numerous power cables coud have been causing the range problems and taking the aerial through a gland in the perspex cover into the free flood space (with the aerial end sealed) may have improved the problem. I have now taken the futaba rx out and replaced it with a schulze delta-840 receiver which has a micro processor system (This is the receiver which Norbert Bruggen advised to use when I had problems sailing the smaller compact ALFA submarine)  I have now tried this in the test tank and with a range check with the tx aerial down at + 20 yards the model will submerge and surface ok. Although this is not on the lake it looks promising.
    Hermann
    Hermann
    AMS member

    Posts : 116
    Join date : 2011-07-03
    Location : at home, near Bremen (Germany)

    D9 Engel Submarine Empty Re: D9 Engel Submarine

    Post  Hermann on Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:38 pm

    Hello everyone,

    please let me give also some remarks concerning receiving aerials in submarine models.

    In principle and independent of the model category routing of the receiving aerial has a major influence of the receiving quality and with bad routing the usable control range may be reduced dramatically ( just like on the transmitter side when the transmitter antenna is not expanded and only a stub).

    But which kind of routing is poor an which is most useful? To receive the control signal the receiver needs a signal voltage at its input, this signal voltage develops between the aerial wire as one pole and the residual wiring such as supply cable, servo cables, speed controller cable etc. ; that residual wiring serves as a "counterweight" to the aerial, as the second pole. A voltage means always a difference between the electrical potentials of two poles, in this case the voltage occurs between the aerial wire and the "counterweight" given by the residual wiring. To pick up as much radio frequency energy of the signal from the electromagnetic field as possible, aerial wire and counterweigth should be layed out as far as possible apart from each other. They shall not be routed together(or even worse, in the same bundle). You can explain this circumstance by yourself when you remember that the measurement unit for the electric field strength is defined as Volt per metre (V/m), so if you have a certain field strength at the location of your model you will get more voltage if you increase the distance between aerial and counterweight (well, when submerged the voltages will be very low, in the range of microvolts). Of course separating aerial wire from the other cabling may be problematic in some cases, especially for small models, but in general it is useful and recommended to follow that rule.

    It is not necessary to route the aerial inside the pressure hull, the aerial may be also in the flooded aria. If your pressure hull (or WTC) contains additional conductive structures (e.g. thread rods of a technics rack) it is important to keep the aerial on distance to these elements and put it outside.

    Of course it is also important to have an effective suppression of interference generated by sources within the model (e.g. brush type motors or switchmode voltage regulators for power supply). For good signal reception a good signal to noise ratio is essential. That means if the field strength of the signal is low (due to attenuation in water) the noise level must be consequently also low and even lower to maintain a sufficient good signal to noise ratio.

    When arranged outside the pressure hull in water it is not necessary to isolate the aerial wire towards the ambient water (but it is also not a disadvantage) because the electrical field component of the electromagnetic waves is exposed to the conductivity of the water.

    Concerning the transition of the radio waves from air to water there are multiple effects that cause a reduction of reception quality. For the first you will have a certain amount of reflection of radio waves at the border layer between the two media air and water (as known from the reflection of light at the water surface). In addition the electrical field component suffers a reduction by the relative high dielectric behaviour of water (relative dielectric coefficient of water is 80!) because the water molecules are in fact small dipoles. So the electric component is reduced very much. On the opposite the magnetic component remains nearly the same.

    You can see from these considerations that we must cope with very small field strengths when submerged , therefore we have nothing to waste of our receiver sensitivity. And therefore it is recommended to route the aerial outside of the pressure hull (or WTC) and as far apart from it as possible. This is even more important when you have metallic structures inside your hull (WTC).

    I think our AMS member John Robinson who is a radio specialist will confirm these considerations.

    Kind regards
    Klaus-Dieter (Hermann)
    nigele(ADMIN)2
    nigele(ADMIN)2
    AMS Chairman

    Posts : 1107
    Join date : 2010-11-06
    Age : 66
    Location : Braintree, Essex

    D9 Engel Submarine Empty Re: D9 Engel Submarine

    Post  nigele(ADMIN)2 on Wed Feb 18, 2015 10:32 pm

    Yes I agree with Hermann 100%, Talking about John her raised a very interesting point in a conversation I had with him some time ago,this concerned the tuned length of the Arial underwater, I happen to mention that I had often found that a shorter Arial seem to work better and give less trouble with interference than the standard length,and John said that that was quite likely to be the case as the wave length underwater is not the same as on the surface he said that there is a formula for working this out.
    avatar
    DAVE J
    AMS member

    Posts : 27
    Join date : 2010-11-13
    Age : 82
    Location : Barrow-in-Furness

    D9 Engel Submarine Empty D9 Engel Submarine

    Post  DAVE J on Sun Feb 22, 2015 8:00 pm

    Sailed with new rx today, no problems with the range, only the trim to sort out now.

    D.

      Current date/time is Fri Sep 25, 2020 7:30 pm