I am thinking of fitting front dive vanes to the skipjack since its not static dive what your view on this
Who is online?
In total there are 6 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 6 Guests
None
Most users ever online was 180 on Tue Nov 05, 2019 6:03 am
Latest topics
Search
Most Viewed Topics
Statistics
Our users have posted a total of 12493 messages in 1987 subjects
We have 1019 registered users
The newest registered user is Flyboy21
Similar topics
5 posters
willie skipjack
willte- Guest
- Posts : 119
Join date : 2013-12-15
Age : 72
Location : lossiemouth morayshire
- Post n°1
willie skipjack
Tom(ADMIN)- AMS Forum Owner
- Posts : 3026
Join date : 2010-11-05
Age : 64
Location : Nevada, USA
- Post n°2
Re: willie skipjack
I've never yet had a sub with working front planes, although this one does have the option...at present they are fixed, but one connection and they can be working.
Hook the front planes up the servo controlled from the tx, and use a leveller on the rears...that'll work nicely.
(just thought...I lied. My Neptune had working front vanes...)
Hook the front planes up the servo controlled from the tx, and use a leveller on the rears...that'll work nicely.
(just thought...I lied. My Neptune had working front vanes...)
david f- AMS Treasurer
- Posts : 2409
Join date : 2010-11-10
Age : 74
Location : Cumbria
- Post n°3
Re: willie skipjack
No, I've never used front dive planes either.
I think the general rule is stern planes to control angle and bow planes for depth control.
That is alright when you have a crew onboard but bow planes are awkward for we modellers (linkages etc.)
I don't have much experience of "pure" dynamic divers though but I think that this would still apply.
David
I think the general rule is stern planes to control angle and bow planes for depth control.
That is alright when you have a crew onboard but bow planes are awkward for we modellers (linkages etc.)
I don't have much experience of "pure" dynamic divers though but I think that this would still apply.
David
salmon- AMS Forum Owner
- Posts : 312
Join date : 2011-09-02
Age : 64
Location : Las Vegas, Nevada - USA
- Post n°4
Re: willie skipjack
I do use bow dive planes, in the case of my Skipjack the sail planes. They are set up so the bow planes are depth control and aft planes are leveler.
That being typed, on the first pool test for the Skipjack, my sail plane connector would not connect. The sail planes were put in a slight down position. She handled great using speed and or the leveler adjustments.
That being typed, on the first pool test for the Skipjack, my sail plane connector would not connect. The sail planes were put in a slight down position. She handled great using speed and or the leveler adjustments.
_________________
If you can cut, drill, saw, hit things and swear a lot, you're well on the way to building a working model sub.
Deep Diver (Fred)- AMS member
- Posts : 270
Join date : 2010-11-07
Age : 75
Location : Peacehaven East Sussex
- Post n°5
Re: willie skipjack
I have them on my T Class & the old Type 7, & I had no problem with them.
Yesterday at 9:21 pm by geofrancis
» 868/915 Mhz as a viable frequency for submarines.
Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:55 pm by geofrancis
» WW2 mini sub build
Thu Sep 05, 2024 8:15 am by david f
» Trumpeter 1/144 PLAN Type 092 Xia Class SSBN
Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:42 am by redboat219
» UHF radio control for submarines (openLRS, LoRa, FSK etc. on 458Mhz and 433Mhz )
Sat Jul 27, 2024 9:05 am by david f
» David Forrest's R class
Fri Jul 19, 2024 1:00 pm by david f
» Futaba -868/915mhz equipment
Sun Jun 09, 2024 10:47 pm by tsenecal
» Darnell type 21 submarine, need some help
Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:35 am by Deep Diver (Fred)
» bladder bags
Tue May 28, 2024 8:30 am by Deep Diver (Fred)